You are given an integer array nums. The range of a subarray of nums is the difference between the largest and smallest element in the subarray.
Return the sum of all subarray ranges of nums.
A subarray is a contiguous non-empty sequence of elements within an array.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,2,3]
Output: 4
Explanation: The 6 subarrays of nums are the following:
[1], range = largest - smallest = 1 - 1 = 0
[2], range = 2 - 2 = 0
[3], range = 3 - 3 = 0
[1,2], range = 2 - 1 = 1
[2,3], range = 3 - 2 = 1
[1,2,3], range = 3 - 1 = 2
So the sum of all ranges is 0 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 1 + 2 = 4.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [1,3,3]
Output: 4
Explanation: The 6 subarrays of nums are the following:
[1], range = largest - smallest = 1 - 1 = 0
[3], range = 3 - 3 = 0
[3], range = 3 - 3 = 0
[1,3], range = 3 - 1 = 2
[3,3], range = 3 - 3 = 0
[1,3,3], range = 3 - 1 = 2
So the sum of all ranges is 0 + 0 + 0 + 2 + 0 + 2 = 4.
Example 3:
Input: nums = [4,-2,-3,4,1]
Output: 59
Explanation: The sum of all subarray ranges of nums is 59.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 1000
-109 <= nums[i] <= 109
Follow-up: Could you find a solution with O(n) time complexity?
Solutions
Solution 1
Thinking
The sum of ranges is the sum of \(\max-\min\) over every subarray. With \(n\le 1000\), enumerating endpoints while maintaining the current max and min is \(O(n^2)\) and acceptable.
The inner scan need not restart: after fixing left index \(i\), extending \(j\) only updates \(\textit{mi}\) and \(\textit{mx}\) and adds their difference.
Solution 1 becomes heavy for larger \(n\). Each value’s contribution as a subarray maximum (or minimum) is its value times the number of subarrays where it attains that extremum, so the range sum is “max contributions minus min contributions”.
A monotonic stack finds, for each index, the previous greater-or-equal and the next strictly greater positions, counting those subarrays in linear time. Negating the array and repeating yields the minimum side.
We therefore implement \(f\) and return \(f(\textit{nums})+f([-v])\).