You are a professional robber planning to rob houses along a street. Each house has a certain amount of money stashed, the only constraint stopping you from robbing each of them is that adjacent houses have security systems connected and it will automatically contact the police if two adjacent houses were broken into on the same night.
Given an integer array nums representing the amount of money of each house, return the maximum amount of money you can rob tonight without alerting the police.
Example 1:
Input: nums = [1,2,3,1]
Output: 4
Explanation: Rob house 1 (money = 1) and then rob house 3 (money = 3).
Total amount you can rob = 1 + 3 = 4.
Example 2:
Input: nums = [2,7,9,3,1]
Output: 12
Explanation: Rob house 1 (money = 2), rob house 3 (money = 9) and rob house 5 (money = 1).
Total amount you can rob = 2 + 9 + 1 = 12.
Constraints:
1 <= nums.length <= 100
0 <= nums[i] <= 400
Solutions
Solution 1: Memoization Search
Thinking
Adjacent houses cannot both be robbed; maximize the take. Subset enumeration must enforce the gap, and overlapping suffixes repeat. From index \(i\), rob and skip to \(i+2\), or skip to \(i+1\), and take the better. Memoization evaluates each index once.
We design a function \(\textit{dfs}(i)\), which represents the maximum amount of money that can be stolen starting from the \(i\)-th house. Thus, the answer is \(\textit{dfs}(0)\).
The execution process of the function \(\textit{dfs}(i)\) is as follows:
If \(i \ge \textit{len}(\textit{nums})\), it means all houses have been considered, and we directly return \(0\);
Otherwise, consider stealing from the \(i\)-th house, then \(\textit{dfs}(i) = \textit{nums}[i] + \textit{dfs}(i+2)\); if not stealing from the \(i\)-th house, then \(\textit{dfs}(i) = \textit{dfs}(i+1)\).
To avoid repeated calculations, we use memoization search. The result of \(\textit{dfs}(i)\) is saved in an array or hash table. Before each calculation, we first check if it has been calculated. If so, we directly return the result.
The time complexity is \(O(n)\), and the space complexity is \(O(n)\), where \(n\) is the length of the array.
Solution 1 is recursive. \(f[i]\) is the best total among the first \(i\) houses: rob house \(i\) and add \(f[i-2]\), or take \(f[i-1]\). Fill the table bottom-up.
We define \(f[i]\) as the maximum total amount that can be robbed from the first \(i\) houses, initially \(f[0]=0\), \(f[1]=nums[0]\).
Consider the case where \(i \gt 1\), the \(i\)th house has two options:
Do not rob the \(i\)th house, the total amount of robbery is \(f[i-1]\);
Rob the \(i\)th house, the total amount of robbery is \(f[i-2]+nums[i-1]\);
Therefore, we can get the state transition equation:
\(f[i]\) in Solution 2 depends only on the previous two values, so two rolling variables cut space to \(O(1)\).
We notice that when \(i \gt 2\), \(f[i]\) is only related to \(f[i-1]\) and \(f[i-2]\). Therefore, we can use two variables instead of an array to reduce the space complexity to \(O(1)\).