1458. Max Dot Product of Two Subsequences
Description
Given two arrays nums1 and nums2.
Return the maximum dot product between non-empty subsequences of nums1 and nums2 with the same length.
A subsequence of an array is a new array which is formed from the original array by deleting some (can be none) of the characters without disturbing the relative positions of the remaining characters. (ie, [2,3,5] is a subsequence of [1,2,3,4,5] while [1,5,3] is not).
Example 1:
Input: nums1 = [2,1,-2,5], nums2 = [3,0,-6] Output: 18 Explanation: Take subsequence [2,-2] from nums1 and subsequence [3,-6] from nums2. Their dot product is (2*3 + (-2)*(-6)) = 18.
Example 2:
Input: nums1 = [3,-2], nums2 = [2,-6,7] Output: 21 Explanation: Take subsequence [3] from nums1 and subsequence [7] from nums2. Their dot product is (3*7) = 21.
Example 3:
Input: nums1 = [-1,-1], nums2 = [1,1] Output: -1 Explanation: Take subsequence [-1] from nums1 and subsequence [1] from nums2. Their dot product is -1.
Constraints:
1 <= nums1.length, nums2.length <= 500-1000 <= nums1[i], nums2[i] <= 1000
Solutions
Solution 1: Dynamic Programming
Thinking
Subsequences must be non-empty and values may be negative. \(m,n\le 500\). Taking only positive products like LCS would miss a single negative pair.
\(f[i][j]\) is the best dot product of the two prefixes: drop one end, or pair them and optionally discard a negative prefix via \(\max(0,f[i-1][j-1])+x\cdot y\). \(-\infty\) forces at least one pair.
We define \(f[i][j]\) to represent the maximum dot product of two subsequences formed by the first \(i\) elements of \(\textit{nums1}\) and the first \(j\) elements of \(\textit{nums2}\). Initially, \(f[i][j] = -\infty\).
For \(f[i][j]\), we have the following cases:
- Do not select \(\textit{nums1}[i-1]\) or do not select \(\textit{nums2}[j-1]\), i.e., \(f[i][j] = \max(f[i-1][j], f[i][j-1])\);
- Select \(\textit{nums1}[i-1]\) and \(\textit{nums2}[j-1]\), i.e., \(f[i][j] = \max(f[i][j], \max(0, f[i-1][j-1]) + \textit{nums1}[i-1] \times \textit{nums2}[j-1])\).
The final answer is \(f[m][n]\).
The time complexity is \(O(m \times n)\), and the space complexity is \(O(m \times n)\). Here, \(m\) and \(n\) are the lengths of the arrays \(\textit{nums1}\) and \(\textit{nums2}\), respectively.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 | |